Search for: "Bey v. Seller"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2012, 1:59 am
Aufgepasst; völliger Haftungsausschluss bei Vertragsbruch auch in den USA nicht zulässig; hier sogar mit enormem Strafschadensersatz belegt (dieser wird eventuell in zweiter Instanz reduziert): Sixth Circuit Affirms $33M Jury Verdict in Breach of Contract Case (Whitesell Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
", C-299/99 - Philips v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
See, e.g., Gray-Bey v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:23 am
See, e.g., Gray-Bey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am
Matthias Weller: “Keine Drittwirkung von Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen bei Vertragsketten” – the English abstract reads as follows: In Refcomp the ECJ rejected any binding effect of a choice of forum clause on following buyers in the distribution chain raising an “action directe” under French law against the first seller. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 12, 2008 Harden-Bey v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
Freidinger, Gerichtsstand und anwendbares Recht bei Konsignationslagern, p. 48: Consignment stocks are one of several techniques to ensure that goods reach the intended market. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
Here, the seller tries to recover a piece of property that is not part of the buyer’s estate. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
Hence, the law governing the contract from which the third party rights are derived plays only a minor role (infra V): for those third party rights neither the special rule for culpa in contrahendo in Art. 12(1) - insofar as pre-contractual third party rights are concerned - nor the escape clauses in Art. 4(3) and Art. 5(2) lead to the law which governs the contract. [read post]
